![]() |
9th
March 2004
|
I
suppose if you wanted to get any sense of continuity you'd have to
read this page from the bottom to the the top - but then it wouldn't
really make sense because what you'd be reading first would be out
of date and quite possibly irrelevant, not that I think any of this
has got any relevance to anything in particular. So where does that
leave me? A short discourse on the subject of punk might
be a good idea. I used to get over the problem of punk by refusing
to align myself with it but that's not going to work anymore - it's
just a short route to getting written out of a section of musical
history:
In a very nice sleeve note on the compilation of my Stiff Record days, Annie Nightingale wrote that I had stayed true to the punk ethic. That seems OK with me - I'm rather proud of it in fact. Punk is fine as an ethic or a spirit but it all comes unstuck when it's defined as a particular musical genre or fashion statement. Back in 76 and 77 it was still fairly unclear what punk actually was - the Buzzcocks were scratchy, the Ramones powerful but dim, the Clash were abrasive and the Sex Pistols were... what were the Sex Pistols - definitely not future Celebrities In The Jungle. And all over the place young upstarts like me were flying in the face of what the record companies and the music press and Radio 1 deemed worthy, upstanding, talented, commercial... It was all a bit homemade - cheap homemade clothes and jumble sale cast-offs, stolen amplifiers, guitars with rusty strings - mend-and-make-do turned into a creative force. It was like a minor communist uprising on the part disaffected middle-class youth - the divorce generation. Oh, I'm sure there was a bit of working class in there but most of the people I knew came from fine upstanding dysfunctional middle-class home backgrounds. I don't think anybody who was truly working class had time for something so essentially dilletantic as punk. Of course, I'm speaking from what I've recently seen described as the art school wing of the movement. |
By
the middle of 1978 I think it was all over. I certainly couldn't relate
to it. By 1981 I was laying myself open to ridicule by suggesting that
the time would soon come when punk bands reformed and did the cabaret
circuit for the nostalgia audience. A bit wide of the mark wasn't I?
There isn't really a cabaret circuit anymore - we've got Tribute now.
I'm fairly convinced that if I could just steal myself to do what I do wearing a cheap acrylic wig I could present myself as 'A Tribute To Wreckless Eric' and play to huge numbers of people who otherwise wouldn't come to see me - people (and I can assure you that these people exist) who go to see tribute bands in the certainty of hearing Good Music. I'd make loads of money and it would be a positive statement from the art school wing of the movement. I've shared this idea with Wilko Johnson and he's come up with a name for this exciting new musical style - we're going to call it Auto-Trib. Wilko was a bit worried to begin with that being older and slightly fatter than we were in our prime, we wouldn't be convincing enough even in our acrylic wigs - but that's an important part of trib - you've got to look a bit unfortunate or you just aren't going to cut it. |
![]() |
The
poster is obviously a hoax but you get the idea. I have to point out
that it's just an illustration of what could be, and not an actual
event that's going to take place, because the world is full of stupid
people and if I don't do this I'll get a load of emails complaining
that I've left the date off. And while I'm on the subject of dates
how are you getting on with finding my gig list? It's quite simple
- or you have to do is put the curser over the pink guitar where it
says 'Live Dates' and as if by magic a crappy box thing will appear
with the dates in it. There - now I've spoilt the surprise. |
The
Enterprise is a bit of a dump and when I arrived there wasn't even
a stage - it had been purloined by the Pet Shop Boys who were doing
one of those we don't have to do this anymore so we're going back
to our routes slum tourist shows at the Monarch. Not that the
Monarch is a slum - well certainly not after the Pet Shop Boys had
finished repanelling the interior - but I'm sure you know what I mean.
The Darkness are doing it as well and a load of other big names that
I can't quite remember at the moment. But thanks to the Pet Shop Boys
a stage had to be built out of beer crates and whatever came to hand.
I took a picture of it before the doors opened. It looks a bit dismal
in the photo but it worked all right and there were so many people
that you couldn't see how pathetic it really was. I supposed the Pet
Shop Boys will return the real one in time and hopefully they will
have scraped off any evidence of gerbils.
Click on the photo for an anorak breakdown of all the junk involved I'm going back into my studio now to do some work. Tomorrow I'll tell you all about Andy Kershaw. |
![]() |
11th
March 2004 |
27
March 2004
|
This
album seems to be taking an awfully long time - I can hardly remember
a time when I wasn't making it. It must be nearly finished by now -
only three more tracks to mix and a few fine adjustments before I take
it to the mastering place where they'll hopefully be able to rescue
it... I'm sort of hoping that people will be apalled by it, but the
reality is that they'll just quietly ignore it. I had a refreshing
conversation with a friend the other day - he said if I made the album
people expect from me it would be very boring. The sad fact is that
people do have an expectation and they don't like being surprised -
people who have an abstract idea in their minds of a new album full
of stuff like Whole Wide World, Reconnez Cherie and Take The Cash.
Having said that I'm almost seduced by the idea myself. I like those
songs, I'm a fan - I'd like to meet myself one day!
I took the evening the evening off on Wednesday and went to see the Who - a bloody stupid thing to do because I'm almost completely deaf in one ear now, and one of my neighbours complained yesterday morning about a nocturnal practice session for the Rutles gigs which are coming up next week. But it was worth it (seeing the Who that is, and I'm hoping the practicing pays off too). The deafness has enhanced my mixing skills - I sort of don't care anymore. Being in a roomful of people whose lives have also been changed, re-routed or whatever by the Who was almost akin to a religious experience. The Beatles and the Stones may have started it off for me but the Who are what made sense of it. I could talk about this all day but I'd better not or the album won't be out in time for Christmas. I took a couple of photos by holding the camera aloft and hoping for the best. Roger and Pete are the out of focus ones at the back: |
![]() |
We're talking about
my generation - all those burgeoning bald patches. It's a bit weird
seeing middle-aged men having little Quadrophenia moments, chanting
'We are the mods' - I wanted to tell them: 'No you're not. |
31
March 2004
|
I
don't know what I can tell you about the first Rutles gig - it wasn't
as terrifying as I thought it might be. For the first time doing supports
of this sort I actually felt that I was part of the reason the show
sold out - when I did stuff with the Blockheads, when Ian was still
alive, it wouldn't have mattered who was supporting, the event would
always sell out. Those gigs were quite easy to do - I could be sure
of some audience support because I was part of the family, but with
the Rutles a lot of their fans wouldn't know who I was. I met some
of them last night and they told me as much (they told me they enjoyed
it too). I also met fans of mine who told me that I was what swung
it for them -if I hadn't been on the bill they might not have bothered.
So I felt useful. But fuck that - I had a great time. Didn't really
get the best of the Rutles afterwards because we were stuck in the
corner with the merchandising. I've got to make a real effort with
that on this tour because the Inland Revenue seem to think that I'm
going to earn a shitload of money this year and have decided to tax
me accordingly. It amounts to little more than an inefficient way of
saving - at the end of the year they'll give it all back to me unless
things go incredibly well. And if that happens I might have to leave
the country - I don't want to pay money in tax which will just go towards
financing the Blair cunt's ride into the history books, I'd prefer
to live in a country that opposed the war. Like France - I still have
my Carte de Sejour. But
then Blair's ride into the annals of history must be pretty well over
by now. Hopefully he's fucked-up badly enough that he'll have to go,
make way for the next cunt. |